Job 32

King James Version

Full text for Job Chapter 32

1¶ So these three men ceased to answer Job, because he [was] righteous in his own eyes.

2Then was kindled the wrath of Elihu the son of Barachel the Buzite, of the kindred of Ram: against Job was his wrath kindled, because he justified himself rather than God.

3Also against his three friends was his wrath kindled, because they had found no answer, and [yet] had condemned Job.

4Now Elihu had waited till Job had spoken, because they [were] elder than he.

5When Elihu saw that [there was] no answer in the mouth of [these] three men, then his wrath was kindled.

6¶ And Elihu the son of Barachel the Buzite answered and said, I [am] young, and ye [are] very old; wherefore I was afraid, and durst not shew you mine opinion.

7I said, Days should speak, and multitude of years should teach wisdom.

8But [there is] a spirit in man: and the inspiration of the Almighty giveth them understanding.

9Great men are not [always] wise: neither do the aged understand judgment.

10Therefore I said, Hearken to me; I also will shew mine opinion.

11Behold, I waited for your words; I gave ear to your reasons, whilst ye searched out what to say.

12Yea, I attended unto you, and, behold, [there was] none of you that convinced Job, [or] that answered his words:

13Lest ye should say, We have found out wisdom: God thrusteth him down, not man.

14Now he hath not directed [his] words against me: neither will I answer him with your speeches.

15¶ They were amazed, they answered no more: they left off speaking.

16When I had waited, (for they spake not, but stood still, [and] answered no more;)

17[I said], I will answer also my part, I also will shew mine opinion.

18For I am full of matter, the spirit within me constraineth me.

19Behold, my belly [is] as wine [which] hath no vent; it is ready to burst like new bottles.

20I will speak, that I may be refreshed: I will open my lips and answer.

21Let me not, I pray you, accept any man's person, neither let me give flattering titles unto man.

22For I know not to give flattering titles; [in so doing] my maker would soon take me away.

AI Analysis

AI Summaries

Short Summary

Elihu, a younger man, becomes angry with Job for self-justification and with his three friends for failing to answer and yet condemning him. He explains that he waited to speak out of respect for their age, but now feels compelled to offer his own perspective, asserting that wisdom comes from God's spirit, not merely from years. He declares his intention to speak without partiality or flattery, as the others have ceased their arguments.

Medium Summary

Chapter 32 introduces Elihu, a younger man who has observed the lengthy debate between Job and his three friends. His wrath is kindled against Job for justifying himself rather than God, and against the friends for their inability to provide a convincing answer while still condemning Job. Elihu explains that he initially refrained from speaking due to his youth and their advanced age, believing wisdom resided with the elders. However, he now asserts that true understanding comes from the "spirit in man" and the "inspiration of the Almighty," not solely from years. Observing that the friends have ceased to speak and failed to persuade Job, Elihu feels an overwhelming compulsion, like wine ready to burst, to express his own opinion. He pledges to speak impartially, without showing favoritism or flattery, fearing divine retribution if he were to do otherwise.

Long Summary

Job 32 marks a significant turning point in the book, as the three friends, Eliphaz, Bildad, and Zophar, finally cease their arguments, concluding that Job remains righteous in his own eyes. At this juncture, Elihu, a younger man identified as the son of Barachel the Buzite, enters the discourse, his wrath kindled. He is angered by Job's persistent self-justification, which he perceives as prioritizing himself over God. Furthermore, Elihu is equally incensed by the three friends, who, despite their inability to provide a satisfactory answer or convince Job, nevertheless condemned him. Elihu explains that he patiently waited for the elders to conclude their arguments, respecting their age and hoping wisdom would emerge from their years. However, upon witnessing their failure to answer Job effectively and their subsequent silence, he feels compelled to speak. He challenges the notion that wisdom is solely the province of the aged, declaring that "there is a spirit in man: and the inspiration of the Almighty giveth them understanding." Elihu asserts his right to speak, having carefully listened to their reasons and observed their inability to convince Job. He clarifies that he will not use their arguments and that Job has not directly addressed him. Feeling a profound inner compulsion, likened to new wine ready to burst from bottles, Elihu proclaims he must speak to find relief. He concludes his introduction by vowing to speak without partiality or flattery towards any man, stating that his Maker would swiftly remove him if he engaged in such conduct.

Core Concepts

  • Elihu's IntroductionElihu, a younger man, enters the debate after Job and his three friends have concluded their arguments, expressing his strong displeasure with both parties.
  • Wrath of ElihuElihu's anger is kindled against Job for justifying himself over God, and against the three friends for condemning Job without offering a convincing answer.
  • Source of WisdomElihu challenges the traditional view that wisdom solely resides with the aged, asserting that true understanding comes from "the spirit in man" and "the inspiration of the Almighty."
  • Compulsion to SpeakElihu describes an intense inner pressure, likened to wine without vent, which compels him to speak and articulate his perspective, finding relief only in expression.
  • Impartiality in JudgmentElihu declares his intention to speak without showing partiality or flattery towards any individual, fearing divine consequences if he were to compromise his integrity.
  • Critique of the FriendsElihu criticizes the three friends for their failure to convince Job and for their inability to provide a satisfactory theological explanation for Job's suffering.